Skip to content
NextSpinWorld

The Venezuelan Crisis Is Poised to Determine President Trump's Legacy - and the United States' Position in the World

In the wake of launching a evening of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the state-building arena.

In a striking media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief declared that US forces had effectively apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then announced that a group including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be seizing the reins of the embattled nation.

"We are going to manage the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "running the country" actually means is uncertain, but the commitment represents an abrupt policy reversal for the president, rife with contradictions and significant obstacles.

A president who ran on opposing "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at regime change and who vowed to implement an "America first" foreign policy is now betting his administration on effectively reconstructing a South American nation whose economic system is in ruins and whose political stability has been undermined by decades of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly upbeat.

He stated his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this would be no different. He promised to enlist American energy companies to repair Venezuela's crumbling industrial infrastructure, providing capital for the American rebuilding project and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He left open the possibility of deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to further these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to heed the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

A Changed Global Approach

The US has altered Venezuela's destiny – whether for good or ill.

Trump came to power nearly a year ago promising to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has demonstrated that he is more than willing to use military force worldwide.

In the past week, he authorized airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted atomic sites in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike past operations, which have mostly involved missiles and warplanes that reduce the risk of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his commitments to the future of that nation – are strikingly different.

His objective, he said during his briefing, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Domestic and International Reaction

That variation of Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - slogan may be tough for some of Trump's backers to swallow.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who split from the president after charging him of deserting his political base, was quick to condemn the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's endless military aggression and support of foreign wars is understandable because we are forced to pay for it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another prominent Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to retake seized US oil and halt fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers rallied behind the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the armed intervention against a "criminal regime" as "decisive and justified".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his appearance, the president argued the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" agenda because it guaranteed US hemispheric security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He revived the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Trump Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will never be questioned again."

The purpose of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect commerce, territory and resources that are fundamental to our security interests." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "home region."

Trump's choice to apprehend Maduro will raise larger concerns in international relations, however, and impact American relations with the world's other significant global powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement expressing shock and condemning what it said was a irresponsible assault on a independent country.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia following its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to mediate a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, expressed concern about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My main worry is now Russia will use this to excuse their unlawful and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an attack of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"America should not be running other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have understood by now not to get entangled in perpetual conflicts and overthrow attempts that carry devastating consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he condemned Trump's choice not to consult with legislative leaders prior to initiating the attack.

"The President has the legal duty to follow the law and protect institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his press conference, said that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "leak" details of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a success – with zero American deaths and limited damage to US equipment. Trump, with his characteristic bravado, portrayed the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most astonishing, effective and powerful displays of American power and competency in American history."

Now he is betting his presidency on that victory continuing, as the US claims it will take over running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that actually means remains unknown. He and his administration must strengthen a nation that has been in chaos for years while calming a region that is bound to be apprehensive of what Trump's foreign policy has planned for them.

The writer

Joshua Perez

A tech journalist and futurist with a passion for emerging technologies and their impact on society.

NextSpinWorld

Type to search articles.